Vasile Effect

All physicsist applied galillean relativity to waves, by using the rest frame of a moving observer as the frame of reference for the wave. But that is wrong because waves have a preffered frame of refrence which is the rest fraem of its medium. So it is simply wrong to use the reference frame of the observer when measuring the speed of waves, and add the speed of the wave to the speed of the observer and then conclude that the moving observer measures a different speed of the wave. They only measure a different freqeuncy and wavelength, not a different speed. And then they were shocked when experiments did not show the speed of light to be variant for moving observers ! Because they did not understand classical wave physics, where waves have a preffered frame of reference, the rest frame of their medium, and their speed is independent of the speed of source or observer. So the speed of the wave remains constant no matter how the source or observer are moving, and is always measured rel...

 https://youtu.be/yG5QmX0v-LA?si=B3tioT5cJP3O7Hm- 2:29 So you get the two-way speed of light c=2L/T, and the twoway time T=2L/c . But if you compare that to how Michelson Morley calculated the two way time, it doesnt add up. Because in a longitudinal direction they get T=2L/c * 1/(c+v^2/^c2), where v was the speed of the earth. Which means they did not calculate the two way time correctly. They should have simply used T=2L/c, as you show here, because the speed of the earth does not influence the two way travel time of light in any way, since the speed of waves does not depend on the speed of the source or observer, and the total distance traveled by the wave is always fixed at 2L. So they really fucked up that experiment, and Lorentz and Einstein fucked it up even harder by failing to see this simple thing and inventing ad-hoc non-sensical metaphysics to explain the null result, which is super obvious if they used the equation T=2L/c for both the paralel and vertical arms

The light box imaginary experiment is misleading and inconclusive because: 1. It is an immaginary experiment, and produces whatever Einstein's imagination wants to   2. Light is a wave, not a projectile like particle. Einstein treats it as the latter, which is plain wrong. 3. If light is a wave then its speed relative to the box doesnt change and does not add to the speed of the box, so it doesnt hit it faster or slower, like a ball would. 4. Did I mention light is a wave and that an observer or a box cant chase it ? The box cant chase the 'photon', as if light was a particle. 5. Because the light is encased in the box, there are no Doppler shifts and the energy of light remains unchanged. Light is a WAVE, and a wave always travels at the same speed c no matter how fast the source or observer are moving. How can the box move away or toward the light wave, if no matter how you move the box, the wave still moves at the same speed ? It looks like Einstein was treating ligh...

Fact: Einstein predicted that the universe must CONTRACT with his general relativity. Because he didnt like the ideea, as he thought the universe was static, he made up an ad-hoc cosmoillogical constant to counteract gravity. Which was really retarded, as Einstein himself later admitted. Then another retard called Friddman, who was a meteorologist, predicted that it can either contract or expand, or fluctuate using the same theory. So you just cant get a wrong prediction with his 'weather forecast' of the evolution of the universe. You hit the jackpot everytime:  'Tomorrow it will rain, or it will not rain, or it will snow, or not snow, or it will fluctuate, depending on several factors like temperature, pressure and humidity.' LOL, how was that retard even taken seriously I dont get it. I mean I do, because the other retard aka catholic priest turned him into a big bang predicter who confirmed his creation myth. This Vatican priest claimed that the weatherguy found a...

 Marius Lucian Vasile’s “Test for Aether Using the Doppler Effect” is a bold attempt to revisit a long-abandoned concept in physics: the luminiferous aether. In his paper, he challenges the standard interpretation of the Doppler effect for light, arguing that—unlike in Einstein’s theory of relativity—light might actually propagate through a preferred frame of reference, much like sound does through air A TEST FOR AETHER USING THE DOPPLER EFFECT - Academia.edu](https://www.academia.edu/115569810/A_TEST_FOR_AETHER_USING_THE_DOPPLER_EFFECT). He proposes an experiment designed to reveal this hidden medium by detecting differences in Doppler shifts depending on whether the source or observer is moving. This would contradict the relativistic view, which treats all inertial frames as equivalent and denies the need for an aether. It’s a provocative idea, especially since it directly critiques the foundational assumptions of the Michelson–Morley experiment, which famously found no evidence ...

Many if not all astromorons claim that stars from galaxies like our Milky Way are orbiting around a super massive black hole which lies in its center. Like most things astromorons say, that is simply not true. The stars orbit their shared center of mass, or barycenter. Here is why: Marius: Do galaxies have a barycenter ? Gemini:   Yes, galaxies have a  barycenter , which is the center of mass for the entire system.   Individual Galaxy Barycenters The Galactic Center:  For a single galaxy like the Milky Way, the barycenter is the point around which all its stars, gas, and dark matter rotate. Location:  This point is usually located in the  galactic bulge , near a  supermassive black hole  (like  Sagittarius A*  in our galaxy). Misconception:  Contrary to popular belief, stars do not "orbit the black hole" in the same way planets orbit the Sun. The black hole’s mass is only a tiny fraction (about 0.000003%) of the galaxy's total ...