The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.
''The Michelson–Morley experiment was an attempt to measure the motion of the Earth relative to the luminiferous aether,[A 1] a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of light waves. The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year.[1]
The experiment compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles. This result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against some aether theories, as well as initiating a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out motion against an aether.[A''
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment
So the whole MM experiment is based on the premise that if the earth is moving through a stationary aether than the speed of light should change depending on the direction in which earth is moving. This is a completelly false and misleading assumption, which shows that these relative scientists really have no ideea how waves propagate in a medium.
If light is a wave, you can't add the velocity of the wave to that of the source, as these relative scientists expected. It will still travel with the speed of light regardless how fast or slow the source is moving relative to the aether medium. Just like a sound wave does. The speed of sound does not increase if the speed of the source increases relative to the air medium.
If a speeding train horns while it passes a station, the people on the station dont measure an increased speed of sound of the horn. What they measure is a an increased or decreased frequency (and wavelength) due to the Doppler effect. The speed is exactly the same.
Michelson Morrey
experiment makes the false assumption that because the earth is moving, the
speed of light should somehow be different in the earth’s direction of movement
compared to a perpendicular direction. This is completelly false if light is a
wave in a stationary aether, which was the main assumption of the experiment.
It will travel at exactly the same speed regardless of the speed or orientation
of the source. So there will be no change in
the speed of light in either direction. Which is exactly what they seen: no
difference. How
does that disprove that aether exists ?! It is completelly illogical to draw
this conclusion, yet here we have dozens of the worlds brightest scientists,
many Nobel laureates, behaving like utter and complete fools who make the most
illogical assumption and then based on it misinterpret their experiments in
exactly the opposite way in which they should be interpretated.
What is truly incredible is that no one has seen their fundamental error before, including the greatest minds of science like ...none, and that this stupid experiment is considered for more than a century by all these relative scientists as the ultimate proof that aether does not exist. When it should have been obvious for anyone who knows basic wave physics that Michelson Morley made a fundamental error in the very premise of the experiment, which could only lead to an erroneus conclusion.
The reason why the speed of light is the same in all frames of reference is because the medium of light, aether, is the only frame of reference for light waves, and the speed of light simply does not depend to any other frames. The speed of light only depends to ITS MEDIUM, which is the AETHER, and light only moves relative to its own fixed frame of reference. That’s why an observer will always measure the speed of light waves in a 'vacuum' which is aether to be the same, regardless if he is on a rocket or on a planet.
And no, a source moving through a static medium is not the same as a medium moving though a static source. This is just illogical equivalency. If a boat moves through a static sea, its not the same as if the whole sea was moving through a static boat. All these relative scientists who think like this are simply illogical and prove once more than Einstein was right...when he said that human stupidity is infinite.
Why on earth would anyone believe that the motion of the earth through the aether would affect the propagation speed of the light wave in any way ? Or in any direction. Thats just as stupid as believing that you can measure a different speed of sound emmited from a moving car, because the sound wave is pushed in the opposite direction by the 'air wind'. So if you measure its speed in the opposite direction, or perpendicular direction, sound will travel at a different speed than in the car's direction. And if no such difference is measured, then it means that the medium of sound waves, AIR, doesnt exist ! LMAO.
These are not scientists, they are CLOWNS. They are ridicuously silly. And the only things they are measuring are their own winds- aka brainfarts.
I am a generalist regarding MMX-1887. The idea originated with James Clerk Maxwell. I don't know the extent of Maxwell's influence and contributions. Albert Michelson built a Light Interferometer in 1881 and the experiment produced the Null Effect (nothing happened). In 1885, Hendrik Lorentz published a paper regarding the Foucault (and Fizeau) experiment(s) in 1850 (and 1851). I have not read the paper, but the MOOD of the Relativists was that it was scientifically impossible to detect motion. Imagine no motion detection sensors. Imagine no RADAR. Christian Doppler published in 1842 that his unaided vision was seeing the Doppler Shift of the stars of the constellations. Hippolyte Armaud Fizeau published a similar paper in 1845. I think that Lorentz's paper in 1885 proposed DON"T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EYES! THE DATA IS A "HOAX"! Michelson recruited Edward Morley to build the Light Interferometer to replicate the experiment that detected partial-drag of the moving water upon the beam of light. That is correct. Motion Detection. Light detected the movement of the water. That changed the stakes of the 1881 experiment. That changed the objective. Instead of detecting the Light-Medium, the experiment would detect the motion of the Earth as it revolved around the Sun. Michelson recruited Morley to build a new and improved Light Interferometer of the design of the 1881 experiment. Another Null Effect. (Nothing happened). The Relativists reacted, "DON"T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EYES! THE DATA IS REVEALING NATURE'S SECRETS! Why? Heliocentrism was threatened. Or, MMX-1887 failed for internal flaws. It was easier to "prove' that motion detection was scientifically impossible than to find the flaws of MMX-1887. It was much preferable to accept the veracity of the fabricated paradigm of Relativity than to accept that Heliocentrism was threatened. About the same time that Einstein wrote his now famous paper in 1905 on Special Relativity to explain how MMX-1887 revealed NATURE'S SECRETS, French scientists were exposing the flaws of MMX-1887. In 1913, George Sagnac returned to the original objective - to detect the Light-Medium. He succeeded with the Sagnac Effect of Light. Twenty years later, RADAR was being developed. The threat to Heliocentrism from MMX-1887 was forgotten AND SO WAS EINSTEIN"S RELATIVITY (despite the sensationalism of the 1919 Total Solar Eclipse). Einstein's Relativity was reduced to an one-page abstract in the appendix of the textbooks that even bothered . . . until 1964. Until the CMB discovery by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson and the paper by James "Jim" Peeples in 1965 that the ambient "radio static" signal on an Earth-bound radio antennae was the physical evidence of the Big Bang. The first paper on the Big Bang was written by George Lemaitre who used Einstein's Relativity (Alexander Freidman's version). Don't lose hope that future generations will correct the mistakes in theoretical physics.
ReplyDelete