Vasile Effect

  First of all, photons don't experience anything because they are not conscious living beings. They are not even inanimate objects, because waves are not objects.  Sound is not a projectile like object that moves with the speed of sound, and neither is light.  So  I cant put myself in a a photon’s shoes, because an EM wave is not an actual object that moves through space. It is a disturbance that propagates in the EM field which oscilates at a certain periodicity - i.e. time. If you take away the periodicity, aka time, the wave cant propagate anywhere, because it has no period and frequency. And this is valid for all waves, like a sound wave is a disturbance in the air medium. So this antropomorphisation of waves is just plain silly, and makes just about as much sense as putting one in the thunder’s shoes.

No. He did not call it a photon either. As Gemini AI explains: In his 1905 paper on the  photoelectric effect ,  Albert Einstein did not use the word "particle" to define light . Instead, he introduced the concept of  light quanta  ( Lichtquanten  in German).   While he famously proposed that light behaves as if it consists of discrete, localized packets of energy, there are important nuances to how he expressed this: 1. Choice of Terminology Einstein avoided the term "particle" because he was careful not to claim that light  was  a literal particle in the classical sense, which would have directly contradicted well-established wave theories. The term  photon  was not coined until 1926 by Gilbert N. Lewis, over two decades after Einstein's initial paper.   2. "Heuristic" Point of View Einstein titled his paper  "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light" . By calling it "heuristic," he was s...

Contrary to what relative scientists claim, the change in tick rate for atomic clocks in space is almost entirely caused by the Earth's magnetic field due to the Zeeman effect. This is an effect that influences the enrgy levels of atoms in magnetic fields, and therefore their absorbtion and emmsion frequency. This is because of the magnetic force (Lorentz force) which acts on charges in a magnetic field which depends on the speed of the charges and on the intensity of the magnetic field:  F=q(vxB).  This force effectively acts on electrons in atoms and changes their energy levels and thus their absorbtion and emmision frequencies, which is known as the Zeeman-Lorentz effect (both got a Nobel prize for this discovery in 1902). Because the intensity of the earth's magnetic field is not the same on ground level as in the sky or space, and because the speed of the charges is also not the same, the atomic clocks will tick at different rates depending on their position (altitude) a...

  The MM experiment was done in Earth's atmosphere which means that air was the medium of propagation and the preferred frame of light, not aether. The atmosphere is comoving with the earth so the light will travel at the same speed c/n in all directions, since there was no relative motion between the earth and the air medium in the basement where they made the experiment. The experiment must be made in a vacuum in order to isolate the aether, and even then a null result does not disprove the aether. Because the null result can also be explained by a fully dragged aether, since the aether theory they were testing was of a STATIONARY aether. But if the aether is fully dragged by the earth the there is no relative motion between the two and no aether wind can be detected. In that case a null result is expected. But MM ignored this experiment was entirely done in earth's atmopshere which is fully dragged by the earth, so the null result is essentially indistingushable from that of...

How can starlight appear gravitationally redshifted by the Sun, if their light is blueshifted as it falls all the way through the sun's gravitational well, and is then redshifted by a smaller amount as it climbs a much smaller distance to Earth ?   When observing a star close to the sun from Earth’s position, the observed shift should actually be a blueshift, not a redshift, because the starlight travels a much longer distance falling into the sun’s gravitational well than climbing out from it as it reaches our telescopes on Earth (or its orbit) ! So the blueshift from gravitational potential should be much higher than the redshift. The fact that we see a redshift means that it is 100% NOT a gravitational redshift, but a plasma redshift from energy loss in the sun’s corona.

They just cant get over that SPEED LIMIT !

Relative scientists claim that it does not change and that is why my demonstration of light speed invariance in classical phyiscs is wrong. Here is what ChatGPT/Copilot says: Does the observed wavelength change for a moving observer ? Yes — the observed wavelength does change for a moving observer. This is the essence of the Doppler effect . Let’s break it down carefully: 🚦 Classical (Sound Waves in a Medium) If the observer moves toward the source , the waves are encountered more frequently → shorter observed wavelength and higher frequency . If the observer moves away from the source , the waves are encountered less frequently → longer observed wavelength and lower frequency . Formula (for sound in a medium with speed v ): f ′ = f ⋅ v ± v o v where: f ′ = observed frequency f = source frequency v = wave speed in medium v o = observer speed (positive if moving toward source) Since wavelength is λ = v / f , the observed wavelength changes accordingly. https://copilot.microsof...