What was the preferred frame of light in the MM experiment

 

The MM experiment was done in Earth's atmosphere which means that air was the medium of propagation and the preferred frame of light, not aether. The atmosphere is comoving with the earth so the light will travel at the same speed c/n in all directions, since there was no relative motion between the earth and the air medium in the basement where they made the experiment. The experiment must be made in a vacuum in order to isolate the aether, and even then a null result does not disprove the aether.

Because the null result can also be explained by a fully dragged aether, since the aether theory they were testing was of a STATIONARY aether. But if the aether is fully dragged by the earth the there is no relative motion between the two and no aether wind can be detected. In that case a null result is expected. But MM ignored this experiment was entirely done in earth's atmopshere which is fully dragged by the earth, so the null result is essentially indistingushable from that of a fully dragged aether



 All waves have a preferred frame. That is the medium in which the wave is propagating. The speed of the wave is constant/invariant because it has a preferred frame, and its speed only depends on the properties of the medium. That is why the speed of the wave does not depend on the speed of the source, nor of the speed of the observer, because it is fixed by the medium. That's why the speed of sound/light does not add to the speed of its source, nor to the speed of the observer. And that is why the speed of light is invariant in a 'vacuum', which is aether, because it only depends on the properties of the aether medium, which is the preferred frame of reference for light. Moving observers only see a change in the apparent frequency and wavelength, due to Doppler effect, but the speed of the sound/light wave is the same when you multiply f' and lambda', because the Doppler shifts cancel out as I have shown here:

https://youtu.be/uv4a8u4413k?si=QIP7fTfuPXjipk5h

This simple calculation proves light speed in aether is invariant for any moving observer without any Lorentz transformations


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more