Refraction causes redshift, gravity does not. General relativity is wrong.

The theory of general relativity (which is the basis of the big-bang theory) is wrong, and I say this because, besides the fact that Einstein abberates that gravity is not a force, but a curvature of space and time, which is an absolute non-sense, not relative, and attributes geodesics to space and time, which is absolutely illogical because space does not have a surface (a geodesic is by definition related to a surface), and time does not have a surface either (the 'surface of time' is an aberration, as well as the 'surface of space', respectively the 'surface of space-time'), the experiments that have allegedly confirmed it are extremely illogical, if not downright stupid.

There are three main tests of general relativity, and all of them disprove general relativity if they are interpreted correctly.

I will first reffer to the one in which the Nobel laureates, scientists Pound and Rebka, used a Helium bag and air to demonstrate that gravity produces the change in wavelength (one of the predictions of general relativity), as the emitter of the gamma ray was placed in helium 'to reduce scattering', and the detector was placed under the helium bag, in air.

Which in fact does not prove anything else except that Refraction, and by no means gravity, produces the shift in wavelength. Gravitation only produces a need to add helium in order to produce a redshift from refraction. Because in the absence of refraction there is no redshift from gravity.

It is ridiculous and also outrageous that these so called scientists received the Nobel Prize for that helium sham experiment, which can be debunked with relative ease as I will show, and that no scientist questioned its validity ever since (more precisely since 1960). Probably because no scientist knows or has not found out that refraction produces a redshift/blueshift:

'Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' (wikipedia)

And the redshifts they know, with the exception of the Doppler one, are pure pseudo-science. Because they confused the refractional redshift with gravitational redshift, and the last from expansion collapses as general relativity collapses (since its prediction of gravitational redshift is false).. 

And this is very easy to prove with just two simple formulas, which clearly show that refraction causes a redshift/blueshift:

                                   f=v/lambda, and v=c/n

 

The frequency of light remains constant during refraction, but the speed of light varies according to the index of refraction, therefore the wavelength (lambda) also varies according to the speed of light:

-if the speed of light increases, then the wavelength will also increase and a Refractional Redshift will occur.

-if the speed of light decreases, then the wavelength will also decrease and a Refractional Blueshift will occur. 

So the great Harvard scientists, awarded with the great Nobel Prize, confused an effect of refraction with one of gravity ! And I don't know if they did it out of ignorance, or with good knowledge, to collect the laurels, money and the Nobel Prize. It is still hard to believe that they could be so stupid and that they added helium 'to reduce scattering from air', but somehow left the detector in air, as shown in the picture with the experiment, instead of placing both in the same medium of helium to reduce both scattering and refraction. 

And the very addition of helium should have raised an eyebrow, since Einstein's theory of relativity has nothing to do with helium or other gases. And in fact the experiment should have been done in a vacuum, or in space, but the geniuses from Harvard were too busy drilling holes in the walls of the university and filling them with helium that this did not occur to them. 

Regardless, their gravitational experiment is actually a refractional one, and its result has nothing to do with gravity, or relativity, but only with refraction. And the fact that in the absence of refraction there is no redshift/blueshift caused by the gravitational potential shows that Einstein's theory is simply wrong and that it was falsified by the very experiment which allegedly confirmed it. 

The implications of this are enormous, in physics and especially in astronomy, where general relativity is used heavily in the standard cosmological model. Which from now on should be called the standard cosmoillogical model.

It is now obvious that the measured redshift of stars has absolutely nothing to do with their gravitational potential, but with their gaseous atmosphere that refracts the light in space, which leads to the increase of speed and of the wavelength, which is a refractional redshift and not a gravitational one. And, since all galaxies are made of stars, that is why all galaxies appear redshifted.

Furthermore, it can be easily proven that all the subsequent experiments which allegedly have proved general relativity, such as the Shapiro gravitational time delay and Gravity probe, are based on the same fundamental error which stems from the complete ignorance of basic refraction physics. Those experiments simply do not take into consideration the fact that radio waves slow down near massive objects because they refract into their atmosphere, thus increasing the time it takes the radio signal to pass through them. Hence the time delay is caused simply by refraction, not by gravitational time dillation.

So most if not all all of the experiments which are claimed to have proven GR can be simply explained by using basic refraction physics, as we have shown, as their Nobel awarded scientists have obviously confused the effects of refraction with those of gravitation.

And this has also been proved by a former NASA scientist, Dr Edward Dowdie, who showed that light does not bend at all outside the solar corona, which refracts it, a fact that contradicts the theory of Einstein who illogically links all these effects of refraction to his space bending gravity. Eddington's experiment did not prove general relativity correct, as it only observed light bending in the sun's corona- and illogically attributed this to relativity instead of refraction.

In conclusion, mainstream scientists falsely and erroneously attribute to gravity effects of refraction, such as bending light and changing wavelength, while de facto using refraction in most of their so-called gravitational experiments, and foolishly confusing the effects of refraction with those of gravitation as peredicted by Einsteins theory. All that they proved is his prediction that:

'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity.' 

And the pseudo-scientists who claim GPS proves Einstein right because the gps signal gets blueshifted by the Earth's gravitational potential dont understand refraction either. The reason of the blueshift has nothing to do with gravity, but with the refraction from the earth's atmosphere, which changes the speed and wavelength of the radio wave. 

And if gravity ALONE causes light to change wavelenght, why no one can experimentally prove this WITHOUT HELIUM, or similar gases which are present in and around stars ? And why there is no light bending outside the sun’s corona, as Edward Dowdye from NASA has shown ? Apparently, light only bends and redshifts when there are gases around, isnt that incredible ? Its as if refraction was actually real, and Einsteins space bending theory was fictional.

Alternative explanation (hypothetical, needs testing): 

This experiment might also be explained by the Doppler effect, as Pound and Rebka used FLOWING HELIUM (from up to down) in their desperate attempt to produce redshift from 'gravitational potential'. So the helium molecules were moving away from the light source- which was placed above the helium bag, and towards the receiver- which was placed under the helium bag. Even if the source did not move relative to the receiver, the medium between them moved, so the gamma ray was absorbed and reemitted from a moving source. Which might have produced a (hypothetical) special case of Doppler shift (caused by the movement of the medium), besides the (proven) refractional Vasile shift. 

Related articles: 

https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/11/an-introduction-to-refractional.html?m=1

 https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/12/why-gps-does-no-prove-einsteins.html?m=1

https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/01/gravitational-time-delay-time-dilation.html?m=1

https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/01/why-space-time-cant-have-geodesics-and.html?m=1