The Vacuum catastrophe shows how catastrophically stupid big bang scientists are

The Vacuum catastrophy is 'the discrepancy between theorized vacuum energy from quantum field theory and observed vacuum energy from cosmology', with the values predicted exceeding observation by some 120 orders of magnitude, a discrepancy that has been called "the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics!".

That means that QFT has been falsifed by the observation. Not by much, just by 10^100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

But, for some reason, scientists still consider QFT a scientific theory. Even when they admit that it has made the worst prediction in the history of physics, with an error of 120 orders of magnitude greater than what they claim to be the observed value of the cosmoillogical dark energetic constant (altough that's measured in 1/m^2, not in Joule, so yeah I guess that makes sense). That’s a 10 at the power of 120 ! The fact that they still use it when it has obviously been falsified by observation is just insane and speaks volumes about how catastrophically stupid or insane these so called scientists are. Altough simply coming with up this prediction shows something is catastrophically wrong with their mental health.

Not even the most insane person from the lunatic asylum could  have come up with a worse prediction than that, but I guess thats why they call quantum physics 'wierd'.

So my guess is that these quantum big-bang pseudo scientists are catastrophically wrong on the issue of space expansion, which is what led them to believe there is dark energy in vacuum, and therefore on the big bang theory as a whole. Which in its whole is an insane theory, based on insane meta-physics and insane assumptions and deductions.

The vacuum catastrophe only shows how catastrophically stupid these pseudo scientists are, who simply refuse to accept that their theories are wrong even when they admit they are catastrophically wrong. They instead cling on to the theory and call the catastrophe a 'cosmological constant problem', which means they are actively trying to find solutions to solve it (to them it's 'a great mystery of the universe' !). I'm pretty sure thats not how the scientific method works, but since they are pseudo scientists, its no wonder they dont care about it at all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of lig
Read more

Photons are imaginary and irrational particles coming straight from Einstein's crackpipe

In the previous article I have proved why Einstein's gravitational redshift does not exist and his general relativity is wrong (because it's prediction of g-shift was obviously false, and could only be 'proved' by adding a bag of helium which changed the wavelength of light from refraction, and not from gravitation). In this article I will show why his photons don't exist either: because they are inconsistent logically and mathematically ! Einstein invented the photon in order to explain the photo-electric effect, which scientists at his time could not explain using the commonly accepted wave model of light. So the genius Einstein came and enlightened them all. Light is a particle ! But, it is also a wave. Hence, it's a particle-wave. And that is why it causes the photo-electric effect, that is free electrons ejecting from the atoms when ultraviolet light is applied on them. Of course, he got a Nobel prize for this explanation. So it must be true, right ? WRONG
Read more

Dark Energy of Vacuum: from HERO to ZERO

Image
The big bang theory is entirely based on the notion that space expands, because there is a dark energy in empty space or vacuum, which causes space to expand at an accelerated rate. For decades scientists have been looking for this mysterious dark energy of vacuum, and, just like in the case of dark matter, none was able to find it. But why ? The answer is: because the dark energy of vacuum is ZERO, and they are literally looking for nothing in nothing. We know that E=mc^2 (thanks Einstein, I mean Poincare), and we also know that vacuum, being massless, has no mass. Therefore, after crunching the numbers into a quantum supercomputer which doesnt work (thanks Feynman), the dark energy of vacuum is:  E = 0*c^2= 0. Now we can imagine a very dark vacuum in which hides a super dark ZERO, but this super dark zero is no super HERO. Certainly not the dark energetic super hero that pushes all galaxies away at speeds in excess of the speed of light. (no, this is not a script from a bad sci-fi
Read more