A test for Aether using Doppler effect

The Doppler effect for sound is calculated using a set of equations, which differ for moving source and for moving observer. This is because of the preferred frame of reference which is given by the rest frame of the medium in which sound travels.

Since the speed of the sound wave is relative to its medium or rest frame, the equation for moving source and stationary observer is not the same as the one for moving observer and stationary source. So the Doppler shift will be different in each case, and the shifted frequencies will NOT be the same.


Moving source:   f ’= f (v/v+vs)

Moving observer: f ’= f (v+vo/v)


In the case of light, there is no such preferred frame of reference given by the medium, because Einstein removed the medium for light waves, which somehow became particles over night, and the equation is basically the same for moving source and moving observer. So the Doppler shift is the same for both cases, i.e. the frequencies will be shifted exactly the same amount. 

But as far as I know, no one actually verified if this actually happens, and that the frequencies actually match. Which is not really scientific, to say the least. 

I therefore propose an experiment which will most likely prove that light waves have a rest frame too, just like sound waves do. This rest frame is the lumineferous aether.


The experiment which I propose is very simple: we send a laser beam from a stationary source to a moving observer (receiver), and then from a moving source to a stationary observer (receiver), while using the same speed for both movements. We compare the frequencies, and if the frequencies received coincide, then there is no preferred frame of reference and aether does not exist, just like Einstein said. If they don't coincide, then there is a preferred frame of reference and aether exists, just like Maxwell, Fizeau, Lorentz, Tesla, Huygens, and most scientists before Einstein said. (Actually some even proved it, like Maxwell who calculated the correct speed of light in aether using Newtons equation for speed of sound and applying it to the aether medium)

And when I say very simple, it's actually not that simple in practice because the devices used to measure the frequency of light (spectrum interferometers) are very big and hard to move. And the ones which are smaller, like Fabry-Perot interferometer, are not exactly accurate. 

But, since they are also EM waves, maybe we could just use radio waves and a car instead. So first we place a radar detector in the stationary car, which will show the exact frequency of the shifted radio wave emitted by a car moving towards it at say 100 km/h. Then we reverse the process and from a moving car at 100km/h detect the frequency of the shifted radio wave emitted by the stationary car (the emmited frequency must be exactly the same in both cases, and the speed of the cars when you measure the frequency must also be exactly the same). And then we compare the two frequencies, which in both cases are Doppler shifted. If they are the same, then Einstein was right and the preferred frame of reference for EM waves aka aether does not exist. But if they are not the same, then aether exists, and light is a sound wave in the aether, just like Maxwell asserted when he calculated the speed of light using Newton's sound wave equation, and just like Tesla affirmed that 'Light is a sound wave in the aether'.

He also said that Einstein was a 'curly haired crackpot', and I am confident that this experiment will disprove his relative crackpottery once and for all.


https://www.academia.edu/115569810/A_TEST_FOR_AETHER_USING_THE_DOPPLER_EFFECT


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more