Big Bang theory contradicts both general and special relativity

 The standard cosmoillogical model or Big Bang theory is entirely based on the notions of vacuum energy and space expansion- which are interlinked (the latter is caused by the first).

But at the same time is claimed to be based on general relativity, and also on special relativity. In reality, it flagrantly violates both.

In special relativity, energy is equivalent with mass.

If energy is equivalent with mass, how does a vacuum or empty space have any energy ?​

It can't ! Because E=mc^2, and vacuum has no mass, so it can't have any energy either ! The energy of vacuum is precisely ZERO according to SR ! In this theory, empty space or vacuum cannot contain any energy, since it contains no mass which can be equivalated with energy E=mc^2. How can anyone claim that vacuum has energy, without rejecting this equation and special relativity altogether ?

And even if vacuum had mass or energy, how does that energy expand space ?
In General Relativity space is curved by mass and energy, which is what causes gravity according to Einstein. Einstein never claimed that energy expands space, and actually he claimed that the universe should contract from gravity according to his theory, where space is curved by mass and energy ! Even if empty space had energy, it would simply curve and contract at a faster rate, and not expand, which is the exact opposite of contraction. It simply does not follow why a space that contains energy (and therefore mass) will expand, it is a non sequitur. And a clear contradiction of Einstein's theory, and of the notion of a vacuum itself. Because a vacuum which has energy or mass is not a vacuum, and is not an empty space at all.

So in order to claim that empty space has energy, you need to reject Special relativity. And in order to claim that this energy expands space, you need to reject General relativity. Big bang cosmologists claim both, so they reject both, while at the same time claiming that both are true and building their standard cosmoillogical model on them.

Their Big Bang theory is inconsistent with special and general relativity, and their standard cosmoillogical model is completelly illogical as it contradicts the very theories on which it is based.


And then they wonder why cosmology is in a crysis ! Because their stupidity is truly infinite and it just never stops. In fact it accelerates at an ever increasing rate, just like the expansion of their big-bang universe.

https://www.academia.edu/120810036/THE_BIG_BANG_THEORY_CONTRADICTS_BOTH_GENERAL_AND_SPECIAL_RELATIVITY



UPDATE:

It seems like everyone has his own interpretation of general relativity. I dont care how others interpret it, I only care how Einstein interpreted it. He said very clearly that mass and energy CURVES spacetime. Big bang ‘scientists’ say that energy expands space, which is the exact opposite of what Einstein said ! And he also said that energy is equivalent with mass, which means if there is no mass there is no energy ! Therefore, the ‘energy of vacuum’ does not exist according to Einstein ! But big bang morons dont understand anything that Einstein said, yet they claim the big bang is based on his theories.

And then when I show that it contradicts them, they say its based on quantum fluctuations, which has NOTHING to do with Einsteins theories on which the big bang theory is based ! And which is responsable for the WORST PREDICTION in the history of physics, known as the Vacuum Catastrophe. But big bang morons still think that it is a correct theory, despite making the most insane and wrong prediction ever made which has a 10^120 error ! Thats 120 orders of magnitude wrong. How can you even have the audacity to claim that this quantum fluctuation is a ‘scientific theory’, and reffer to it as if it has been actually proven right by the observations, which have only proved it catastrophically wrong ?





A vacuum has no mass, so it has no energy according to SR mass-energy equivalence. I dont know what is so hard to understand ! Neither SR or GR say that energy is equivalent with a vacuum, or nothing. Are there is NOTHING in a vacuum which can expand ! Unless you believe in aether. But Einstein removed the aether in SR and GR. So what expands ?? Also, in GR Einstein claims that mass and energy CURVES space. That is what causes GRAVITY. How is energy of vacuum, assuming that SR is wrong and energy is equivalent to NOTHING, EXPANDING space then and countering gravity ? Which is the exact OPPOSITE to what energy does in his theory, aka curving space and creating gravity ???



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction ...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more