Cosmological redshift is explained by aether.

 Tesla said that 'Light is a sound wave in the aether'. This was also implied by Maxwell who calculated the speed of light as a sound wave in aether, using Newtons equation for sound waves. Just like sound waves loose amplitude in the medium, so do light waves. Classical wave physics perfectly explain the redshift, there is no need for insane space bending metaphyisics. Which reject the existence of a medium for light waves, on the grounds that Einstein made an illogical claim, based on his absurd explanation of the photoellectric effect, that they are also particles, or photons. Which have no amplitude what so ever, because their energy is expressed as a function of frequency only ! E=hf. Einstein, while copying Planks black body radiation, forgot that waves must have an amplitude, otherwise they are lines. Which makes his particle-wave a particle-line. Since you cant have a wave with no amplitude. And the energy of a wave is directly proportional to its amplitude squared, so you cant have energy without amplitude either. If the photon particle-wave has no amplitude, then it has no energy. So the equation E=hf, while it may be accurate to describe black body radiation, as Plank did, presumably because the amplitude remains constant in the case of light emmited by blackbodies, is wrong when attributed to EM waves in general, because it is not directly proportional with amplitude- which is missing from that particular wave equation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction ...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more