Big bang theory contradicts special and general relativity

Big Bang theory contradicts general and special relativity

The standard cosmoillogical model or Big Bang theory is entirely based on the notions of vacuum energy and space expansion. These two concepts are incompatible with special and general relativity, which are used by big bang scientists to model their expanding big-bang universe.

In special relativity, energy is equivalent with mass.

If energy is equivalent with mass, how can a vacuum or empty space have any energy ?​

It can't. Because a vacuum by definition contains no mass. So it can't have any energy either. The energy of vacuum is precisely ZERO according to SR and the equation E=mc^2 ! In this theory, empty space or vacuum cannot contain any energy, since it contains no mass which can be equivalated with energy E=mc^2. How can anyone claim that vacuum has energy, without rejecting this equation and special relativity altogether ?

And even if vacuum had mass or energy, how can that energy expand space ?

Again, it can’t.
Because In General Relativity space is always curved by mass and energy, it is not expanding from it. This is what causes gravity according to Einstein. Einstein never claimed that energy expands space, this is just the absurd interpretation of big bang cultists who interpret his cosmoillogical constant as vacuum energy, despite having unit of 1/m^2, not Joule/m^3, and despite Einstein removed it from his theory calling it his biggest blunder. And the only reason why he invented this cosmoillogical constant, was because his general theory predicted that the universe should be contracting from all the mass and energy that curves space everywhere in the universe ! So even if empty space or vacuum had energy, it would simply curve space and contract the universe at a faster rate, and not expand it at a faster rate. It simply does not follow why a space that contains energy (or mass) will expand, it is a non sequitur. And a clear contradiction of Einstein's general theory, and of the notion of a vacuum itself. Because a vacuum which has energy or mass is not a vacuum, and is not an empty space at all.

So in order to claim that empty space has energy, you need to reject Special relativity. And in order to claim that this energy expands space, you need to reject General relativity (as formulated by Einstein, not as interpreted by big bang priest Lemaitre). Big bang cosmoillogists claim both, so they reject both, while at the same time claiming that both are true and building their standard cosmoillogical model on them.

The Big Bang theory is inconsistent with special and general relativity, and the standard cosmoillogical model is completelly illogical as it contradicts the very theories on which it is supposedly based.