Dilatarea temporala gravitationala e o ineptie care nu poate exista nici macar in teorie


In teoria relativitatii generale Einstein sustine ca lumina ar fi incetinita atunci cand intra intr-un 'put gravitational' (gravitational well), pentru ca timpul s-ar dilata pe masura ce lumina inainteaza in preputul gravitational. Asta inseamna ca, in conformitate cu teoria sa, orice obiect care intra intr-un put gravitational ar trebui sa isi micsoreze viteza pe masura ce inainteaza (sau cade) in acesta. Adica ar trebui sa DECELEREZE, nu sa accelereze. Asta inseamna ca acceleratia gravitationala nu ar trebui sa existe, pentru ca teoria gravitationala a marelui Einstein, care a ramas repetent in liceu de genial ce era, implica o deceleratie gravitationala cauzata de incetinirea timpului in preputul gravitational. Si, atentie, in teoria sa gravitatia nu reprezinta o forta, ci tocmai aceasta dilatare a timpului, cuplata cu o curbare a spatiului, care ultima nu se aplica decat la viteze apropiate de cea a luminii. Deci pentru viteze mici spatiul nu se curbeaza, doar cand o bagi intr-a 6-a se warpeaza spatiul. Fix ca in Star-Trek ba, Jean Luc Piccard e martor ca asa se intampla ! Si androidul Data, care enters Warp Mode right now as we speak

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when the s
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of lig
Read more

Refraction causes redshift, gravity does not. General relativity is wrong.

Image
The theory of general relativity (which is the basis of the big-bang theory) is wrong, and I say this because, besides the fact that Einstein abberates that gravity is not a force, but a curvature of space and time, which is an absolute non-sense, not relative, and attributes geodesics to space and time, which is absolutely illogical because space does not have a surface (a geodesic is by definition related to a surface), and time does not have a surface either (the 'surface of time' is an aberration, as well as the 'surface of space', respectively the 'surface of space-time'), the experiments that have allegedly confirmed it are extremely illogical, if not downright stupid. There are three main tests of general relativity, and all of them disprove general relativity if they are interpreted correctly. I will first reffer to the one in which the Nobel laureates, scientists Pound and Rebka, used a Helium bag and air to demonstrate that gravity produces the change
Read more