Photons do not exist. Waves are not particles.

In special relativity, Einstein equates a light wave with a particle, which he calls a photon, and calculates the momentum of a photon p by equivalating the energy of the wave with the energy of the photon particle.

The formula p=h/lambda comes by equivalating the wave energy E=hc/lambda with the particle energy E=pc. But, since p=mc, we get E=pc=mc^2 which is the energy formula for objects with rest mass. Therefore, the two energy equations cannot be equivalated, because the first is for waves, which do not have the property of mass, and the second is for particles with rest mass ! So the problem is that the wave-particle duality equates the energy of a wave, which is indeed massless, with that of a single particle, which is not a massless wave, and derrives all kind of illogical equations from this particle-wave non-sense. Which is an illogical equivocation, a clear logical fallacy made by Einstein, who conflates particles with waves, a foolish mistake which can only lead to wrong derrivations.


But in reality, a wave is not a particle, it is 'a disturbance which tranfers energy from particle to particle in a medium'. It is illogical to claim that a disturbance in a medium made of particles is a particle !

You cant logically explain a wave without a medium. Because a wave is defined as ‘a disturbance which tranfers energy from point to point in a medium’. If light is a wave, then it must by definition have a medium of propagation in which the energy is tranferred from point to point. And if this medium does not exist and light is a projectile like particle, then it cant be a wave. And scientists will say, its not in the classical sense, but then in what sense ?? The wave is only defined in the classical sense, there is no other definition for waves ! So claiming that light is a wave, in some other sense that a wave is defined, makes absolutely no sense. And this is why even scientists say, that 'no one understands quantum mechanics' (Feynman), or that 'quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense' (Penrose).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction ...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more