Photoelectric effect is caused by resonance. Light is a wave, not a particle

 

Photoelectric effect is caused by resonance. Light is a wave, not a particle.

Post by mariuslvasile 


As we all know Einstein 'explained' the photoelectric effect by treating light as a particle, and contradicting himself because he agrees light is also a wave. His explanation is not scientific because it is not coherent or self-consistent.

My explanation is that it is Resonance which causes this effect. In the same way that a sound wave of a certain frequency can break glass, due to resonance, a light wave of a certain frequency can break an electron from its orbit. So in order to confirm this theory I asked chatgpt what is the orbiting frequency of a ground state electron in an aluminium atom:
ChatGPT wrote:The orbital frequency of a ground-state (1s) electron in an aluminium atom, using the Bohr model, is approximately:

5.93×10^15Hz.

This frequency is in the ultraviolet (UV) region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Surprise surprise !
Turns out it has a frequency which coincides or corresponds with the UV range. Which is the light used in the photoelectric effect experiments to eject electrons from aluminium atoms.

So the effect is clearly caused by resonance. It has nothing to with light being a particle, but with light being a wave which resonates with the electron’s orbiting frequency. This resonating frequency is exactly what is causing the electrons to be ejected. Einstein’s particle theory is just wrong. Light is a wave, not a projectile like particle ! And it cant be both, because it’s a contradiction and an illogical equivocation.

So Einstein's Nobel needs to be revoked, and given to moi. Altough I will refuse it, just like Tesla cause I dont need that crap. Its not even made of gold, and I dont know why everyone is dying to get it. Youve got a nobel, so what ? That doesnt make you right, cause some guy on the internet comes 100 years later and shows your Nobel awarded theory was wrong. Which was obvious from the start, because it was contradictory.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction ...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more