Michelson Morley experiment disproved Aether Drag and proved Aether is Universally Still

 Michelson Morley experiment was specifically designed in the context of an aether drag theory. The only reason they expected the speed of light to change in different directions is because they were basing the experiment on Fresnel’s aether drag experiment which they allegedly confirmed, and they believed that this drag would induce an ‘aether wind’ as the earth moves in the aether, which would change the speed of light in different directions. Without this aether drag non-sense, no aether wind should be expected in an universally still aether, and no change in the speed of light should be detected. So the null result simply showed that this aether drag theory is false, and that there is no aether wind, because the aether is UNIVERSALLY STILL, just like Maxwell said it was.

‘Maxwell's equations required that all electromagnetic waves in vacuum propagate at a fixed speed, c. As this can only occur in one reference frame in Newtonian physics (see Galilean relativity), the aether was hypothesized as the absolute and unique frame of reference in which Maxwell's equations hold. That is, the aether must be "still" universally, otherwise c would vary along with any variations that might occur in its supportive medium.’ (Wikipedia- Lumineferous Aether)

In this absolute frame of reference light should have the same speed in all directions, regardless of the motion of the earth. Because the speed of waves does not depend on the speed of the source ! But these clueless pseudo-scientists lead by Einstein keep insisting that it does, and that the experiment disproved aether because of their complete ignorance of classical physics. By the same logic, they could also claim that air doesnt exist, because the speed of sound waves does not depend on the speed of the source either. That is, if the air is still, and the source is moving in air, the speed of the sound waves is the same in all directions ! It doesnt matter how fast the source is moving in air, because the speed of sound waves only depends on its medium of propagation. The same thing applies to light waves emmited by a moving source in a still aether.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction ...
Read more