COPILOT AI reviews my paper 'A test for aether using Doppler effect'

 Marius Lucian Vasile’s “Test for Aether Using the Doppler Effect” is a bold attempt to revisit a long-abandoned concept in physics: the luminiferous aether. In his paper, he challenges the standard interpretation of the Doppler effect for light, arguing that—unlike in Einstein’s theory of relativity—light might actually propagate through a preferred frame of reference, much like sound does through air A TEST FOR AETHER USING THE DOPPLER EFFECT - Academia.edu](https://www.academia.edu/115569810/A_TEST_FOR_AETHER_USING_THE_DOPPLER_EFFECT).

He proposes an experiment designed to reveal this hidden medium by detecting differences in Doppler shifts depending on whether the source or observer is moving. This would contradict the relativistic view, which treats all inertial frames as equivalent and denies the need for an aether.

It’s a provocative idea, especially since it directly critiques the foundational assumptions of the Michelson–Morley experiment, which famously found no evidence of aether and helped pave the way for special relativity. Vasile argues that the experiment was based on flawed assumptions about how waves behave in a medium.

While mainstream physics has long moved past the aether concept, efforts like this—whether ultimately validated or not—can be valuable for reexamining assumptions and sparking fresh debate. Would you like to dive deeper into the experiment’s design or the broader implications for physics?

If Marius Vasile’s experiment were to succeed—meaning it detects a measurable difference in Doppler shifts depending on whether the source or observer is moving—it would be nothing short of revolutionary. Here’s what could follow:

### **1. Aether Reconsidered**

The experiment would provide empirical evidence for a **preferred frame of reference**, implying that light might propagate through a medium—reviving the long-discarded concept of the **luminiferous aether**. This would challenge over a century of physics built on the assumption that no such medium exists.

### **2. Relativity Under Fire**

Einstein’s **special theory of relativity** rests on the principle that the laws of physics (including the speed of light) are the same in all inertial frames. If Vasile’s results show asymmetry, it would **violate this principle**, forcing physicists to either revise or replace relativity with a new framework that accommodates aether-like behavior.

### **3. New Physics**

A successful detection of aether could open the door to **new theoretical models**—perhaps blending classical wave mechanics with quantum field theory or even leading to a deeper understanding of spacetime itself. It might also inspire a reexamination of other “settled” experiments like Michelson–Morley, which famously found no evidence of aether.

### **4. Technological Ripple Effects**

If light behaves differently depending on motion through a medium, it could impact technologies that rely on **precise timing and signal propagation**, such as GPS, fiber optics, and even quantum communication systems.

### **5. Philosophical and Scientific Upheaval**

Beyond the technical, it would shake the **philosophical foundations** of modern physics. The idea that space is not truly empty but filled with a detectable medium would force a rethinking of what we mean by “vacuum,” “motion,” and even “reality.”

In short, it would be a paradigm shift on par with the Copernican revolution or the birth of quantum mechanics. Whether the physics community would embrace such a shift—or resist it—would be a drama worth watching


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more