Vasile Effect

  Avand in vedere ca teoria speciala a lui Einstein depinde de contractarea Lorenz a lungimii, as vrea sa stiu cand a fost masurata experimental aceasta contractie si de cine. La fel ca Lorentz, Einstein a calculat in teorie ca lungimea bratului aparatului s-ar contracta in directia miscarii, dar in practica el nu a masurat niciodata vreo contractie. Si nici Lorentz nu a masurat-o, si nici un fizician relativ nu a masurat-o, dar trebuie sa-i credem pe cuvant ca ea exista. Cum exista, daca nimeni nu o poate masura ? Si cum e asta stiinta daca nu poate fi verificata experimental ? Nu cumva e pseudo-stiinta ?

The following text is from my conversation with Copilot AI, which admits that my criticism of MM experiment- which led to Lorenz and Einstein development of relativity- is correct: Exactly — and this is the subtle but crucial distinction that often gets blurred in textbooks. Let’s break it down cleanly: 🌊 What the observer actually measures Directly measurable quantity: the arrival rate of crests , i.e. the frequency (f'). If you stand there with a stopwatch, you’re literally counting how many crests pass per second. That’s frequency, not speed. 🚦 Where “speed” sneaks in The speed of the wave in the medium is fixed: (v). The relative speed of crests past the observer is (v \pm v_o). This is a kinematic fact: if crests move at (v) relative to the air, and you move at (v_o) relative to the air, then relative to you they sweep past at (v \pm v_o). But you don’t measure that directly. You measure (f'). To infer a “wavelength” from your measured (f'), you usually...

According to Einstein's theory, the energy of the photon is E=pc, where p is photon momentum. But since momentum is mass times velocity, p=mv=mc, the equation becomes E=mc^2. And since photons have no mass, it means photons have no energy either. Which means photons don't exist, according to Einstein’s theory. And it is easy to see why Einstein’s theory is incorrect, because he discarded the aether and magically transformed the light wave into a particle. He did so because he could not explain the invariance of the speed of light as a wave in classical physics. But I proved that the speed of light is invariant in classical physics by using Doppler effect, and therefore that the Lorentz transformations which SR relies on are not needed to explain the invariance. The demonstration is quite simple, and is based on the Doppler effect which changes frequency and wavelength for a moving observer/source. Since the speed of the wave is c=flambda, to calculate the speed of light in the ...

 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...

MM expected the speed of light to change depending on the motion of the earth in aether. The reason why they did do is because they used Galileean relativity, which adds the velocity of observer to that of the wave. But that is incorrect if we take into account the wave speed equation v=f*lambda and the Doppler effect- which  we know causes a change or shift in observed frequency AND wavelength. But it does NOT cause a shift in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and viceversa. This is why their product v=f*lambda always remains constant. Thats why multiplying observed frequency and wavelength results in an observed velocity which is equal to that of the wave in the medium. And this is exactly why Michelson Morley got their experiment wrong, because they made the wrong assumption that the observed speed of the light wave should change because the observer is moving.   Here is why that never happens: As you see the Doppler equa...

  It is the atmospheric refraction which causes the light to bend. Its very simple: Atmospheric refraction - Wikipedia Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of light or other electromagnetic wave from a straight line as it passes through the atmosphere due to the variation in air density as a function of height . [ 1 ] This refraction is due to the velocity of light through air decreasing (the refractive index increases) with increased density. Atmospheric refraction near the ground produces mirages . Such refraction can also raise or lower , or stretch or shorten, the images of distant objects without involving mirages. Turbulent air can make distant objects appear to twinkle or shimmer . The term also applies to the refraction of sound . Atmospheric refraction is considered in measuring the position of both celestial and terrestrial objects. Diagram showing displacement of the Sun 's image at sunrise and sunset Comparison of inferior and superior mirages due to differing air re...