Posts

Dilatarea timpului e la fel de reala ca ceasul cu lumina al lui Einstein

  Pentru a demonstra că relativitatea specială este adevărată și că dilatarea timpului este reală, Einstein a trebuit să isi imagineze efectiv un ceas relativ special, un ceas cu lumină, care practic nu există decat in capul lui relativ sec. Așadar, dovada suprema a lui Einstein că timpul se dilată a fost că el și-a imaginat un ceas cu lumină magic care dilata timpul. Daca ma gandesc bine, si eu pot demonstra că porcii zboară dacă îmi pot imagina un porc cu aripi. Exact asa a demonstrat si Einstein teoriile lui metafizice. Dilatarea timpului este la fel de reală ca ceasul de lumină al lui Einstein, pe care l-a folosit pentru a o deriva. Este science fiction pur, si prin aceasta derivare fantasmagorica bazata pe un ceas care nu exista el a trimis intreaga fizica in deriva.  Einstein nu a fost un ceasornicar de ceasuri cu lumină și nici măcar nu a încercat să construiască unul. Și dacă cineva a încercat, este evident că a eșuat, deoarece nu există nici un ceas cu lumină. Sunt im...
Post a Comment
Read more

Time dilation is as real as Einstein's light clock which he used to derrive it

To prove that special relativity is true and that time dilation is real, Einstein had to actually imagine a relatively special clock, a clock with light, which practically does not exist except in his head. So Einstein's supreme proof that time dilates was that he imagined a magic light clock that dilated time. If I think about it, I can also prove that pigs fly if I can imagine a pig with wings. This is exactly how Einstein proved his metaphysical theories. And this is why time dilation is as real as Einstein's light clock, which he used to derive it. It's pure science fiction. Einstein was not a light clock maker nor did he even attempt to build one. And if anyone tried, they obviously failed, since no light clock exists. They are impossible to build, since light simply does not behave the way Einstein imagined. The direction of light does not magically change to reach the moving mirrors and reflect off each other at infinity, simply because Einstein imagined this must be...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intarzierea Shapiro sau intarzierea mintala a fizicienilor relativi

  Efectul de întârziere temporală Shapiro, sau efectul de întârziere temporală gravitațională, este unul dintre cele patru teste clasice ale Sistemului Solar ale relativității generale. Semnalele radar care trec în apropierea unui obiect masiv au nevoie de puțin mai mult timp pentru a ajunge la o țintă și de mai mult timp pentru a se întoarce decât ar avea dacă masa obiectului nu ar fi prezentă. Întârzierea temporală este cauzată de dilatarea timpului, care crește timpul necesar luminii pentru a parcurge o anumită distanță din perspectiva unui observator extern.[...] Pe parcursul acestui articol care discută despre întârzierea temporală,  Shapiro folosește c ca viteză a luminii și calculează întârzierea temporală a trecerii undelor sau razelor luminoase pe o distanță de coordonate finite , conform unei soluții Schwarzschild la ecuațiile de câmp ale lui Einstein..." (extras din articolul Wikipedia din engleza tradus in romana) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_time_delay Și...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shapiro time delay is retarded

  The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by time dilation, which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...]Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays  over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations …’ (wikipedia) And, just like Einstein, Shapiro completely ignores that the speed of light DECREASES near massive objects because it refracts in their ATMOSPHERE. Which immediatelly explains why there is a slight time delay, without any of this relative non-sense. S...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why do relative scientists claim that photons dont experience time ?

  First of all, photons don't experience anything because they are not conscious living beings. They are not even inanimate objects, because waves are not objects.  Sound is not a projectile like object that moves with the speed of sound, and neither is light.  So  I cant put myself in a a photon’s shoes, because an EM wave is not an actual object that moves through space. It is a disturbance that propagates in the EM field which oscilates at a certain periodicity - i.e. time. If you take away the periodicity, aka time, the wave cant propagate anywhere, because it has no period and frequency. And this is valid for all waves, like a sound wave is a disturbance in the air medium. So this antropomorphisation of waves is just plain silly, and makes just about as much sense as putting one in the thunder’s shoes.
Post a Comment
Read more

Did Einstein ever claim that light is a particle ?

No. He did not call it a photon either. As Gemini AI explains: In his 1905 paper on the  photoelectric effect ,  Albert Einstein did not use the word "particle" to define light . Instead, he introduced the concept of  light quanta  ( Lichtquanten  in German).   While he famously proposed that light behaves as if it consists of discrete, localized packets of energy, there are important nuances to how he expressed this: 1. Choice of Terminology Einstein avoided the term "particle" because he was careful not to claim that light  was  a literal particle in the classical sense, which would have directly contradicted well-established wave theories. The term  photon  was not coined until 1926 by Gilbert N. Lewis, over two decades after Einstein's initial paper.   2. "Heuristic" Point of View Einstein titled his paper  "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light" . By calling it "heuristic," he was s...
Post a Comment
Read more

How atomic clocks are influenced by Earth's magnetic field. Lorentz-Zeeman effect

Image
Contrary to what relative scientists claim, the change in tick rate for atomic clocks in space is almost entirely caused by the Earth's magnetic field due to the Zeeman effect. This is an effect that influences the enrgy levels of atoms in magnetic fields, and therefore their absorbtion and emmsion frequency. This is because of the magnetic force (Lorentz force) which acts on charges in a magnetic field which depends on the speed of the charges and on the intensity of the magnetic field:  F=q(vxB).  This force effectively acts on electrons in atoms and changes their energy levels and thus their absorbtion and emmision frequencies, which is known as the Zeeman-Lorentz effect (both got a Nobel prize for this discovery in 1902). Because the intensity of the earth's magnetic field is not the same on ground level as in the sky or space, and because the speed of the charges is also not the same, the atomic clocks will tick at different rates depending on their position (altitude) a...
Post a Comment
Read more