How Einstein proved photons don't exist

According to Einstein's theory, the energy of the photon is E=pc, where p is photon momentum. But since momentum is mass times velocity, p=mv=mc, the equation becomes E=mc^2. And since photons have no mass, it means photons have no energy either. Which means photons don't exist, according to Einstein’s theory.




And it is easy to see why Einstein’s theory is incorrect, because he discarded the aether and magically transformed the light wave into a particle. He did so because he could not explain the invariance of the speed of light as a wave in classical physics.

But I proved that the speed of light is invariant in classical physics by using Doppler effect, and therefore that the Lorentz transformations which SR relies on are not needed to explain the invariance. The demonstration is quite simple, and is based on the Doppler effect which changes frequency and wavelength for a moving observer/source. Since the speed of the wave is c=flambda, to calculate the speed of light in the observer’s frame we only have to multiply the observed frequency and wavelength for a moving observer relative to a stationary source, and the result is that we get f’lambda’=c, the constant speed of light measured in the frame of the observer. In the case of MM experiment this is even simpler, because the source and observer are moving at the same speed, so there is no doppler shift and the observed speed of light is simply flambda=c.

This completelly discards the need for Lorentz’s transformations and therefore makes Einstein’s SR obsolete.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more