The Big Bang is the religion of modern pseudo-scientists

 The Big Bang theory is a creation myth developed by a catholic priest who was a wannabe scientist, who was infiltrated by the Vatican in mainstream science, and is now the current religion of most scientists. And like all religious fanatics, they will not accept it is wrong despite obvious contradictions and failed predictions of the model.

For example, the fact that galaxies are colliding with each other shows that galaxies are not moving away from each other, as their theory predicted. This is clear and in your face evidence that their expanding universe theory is wrong.

Then the fact that galaxies from the so called 'early universe' look exactly the same as the ones from now, which again contradicts all their predictions about galaxy formations which should have been much smaller, and no large eliptical and spiral galaxies should have been formed in that early period. And these large galaxies are formed when smaller galaxies COLLIDE, so again how do they collide if they're moving away from each other ???

Then the fact that their whole theory is based on the intrepretation of cosmological redshift as being caused by space expansion, which is a circular argument because it assumes the very thing they are trying to prove- that space is expanding. So they conclude space expands because they assume that cosmological redshift is caused by space expansion. That's no better than the circular argument used by creationists: the bible is true because it was inspired by god, and god exists because the bible is true. In fact, its the same retarded fallacy of circular reasoning.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more