Einsteins light box imaginary experiment

The light box imaginary experiment is misleading and inconclusive because:
1. It is an immaginary experiment, and produces whatever Einstein's imagination wants to  
2. Light is a wave, not a projectile like particle. Einstein treats it as the latter, which is plain wrong.
3. If light is a wave then its speed relative to the box doesnt change and does not add to the speed of the box, so it doesnt hit it faster or slower, like a ball would.
4. Did I mention light is a wave and that an observer or a box cant chase it ? The box cant chase the 'photon', as if light was a particle.

5. Because the light is encased in the box, there are no Doppler shifts and the energy of light remains unchanged.


Light is a WAVE, and a wave always travels at the same speed c no matter how fast the source or observer are moving. How can the box move away or toward the light wave, if no matter how you move the box, the wave still moves at the same speed ? It looks like Einstein was treating light as a ball like particle, not as a wave. There are NO photons in Maxwell's equations.

Also, these immaginary thought experiments are completelly pointless if there's no way to reproduce them in the real world. Just because you can imagine something doesnt mean that can actually happen. For example Einstein's light clock is pure non-sense because light doesnt behave like Einstein imagines or expects it to behave. Because light is wave, it's speed does not compose with the speed of the mirrors and doesnt follow the mirrors as they are moving, it simply misses them. Thats why its physically impossible to build a functional light clock using two mirrors and a 'photon'. Only if light was a ball like particle you could do that

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more