Is gravity a force or a space? If it's not a force, then why is it measured in Newton? If it's a curved spacetime, then why isn't it measured in Einstein, or in curved metersecond?

‘According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, time and space are fused together in a quantity known as spacetime. Within this theory, massive objects cause spacetime to curve, and gravity is simply the curvature of spacetime.’ (esahubble.org)

If space and time are fused together, like Einstein claims, then the only way to measure his spacetime is in metersecond, and curved spacetime in curved metersecond. It makes no sense to use time and distance as separate units. Just like it makes no sense to measure the curvature of spacetime which he calls gravity in Newtons. Because that is not a force, and therefore we can’t use the measuring unit of force to measure a non-force.

But these relative physicists don’t really care about getting the units right, and go as far as to claim that Einstein’s cosmoiilogical constant Lambda, which has unit of 1/m^2, represents the energy density of vacuum ! When the unit should be Joule/m^3. And then they wonder why they get the worst prediction in the history of physics, called the Vacuum catastrophy, which they call the cosmoillogical constant problem. Because they are just catastrophically stupid.


 We are all thought in school that gravity is a force, and that Newton is the one who discovered it. It was the force of gravity which acted on the apple and caused it to fall in Newton's head, which lead him to this revelation and formulation of newtonian gravity as a force. Then we go to university we are thought that gravity is not actually a force, but a curvature of spacetime as depicted by Einstein in his space bending theory of general relativity. The story is that he had this revelation when he was smoking his crackpipe and was seeing space warping from all that smoke.


This is pure cognitive dissonance. If gravity is not a force, then Newton's theory is wrong and we should not express it in terms of force and newtons. We should express it in terms of spacetime and einsteins, or meterseconds. The reason why we dont, is that because Einsteins theory doesnt make any fucking sense. And no one, including these scientists, actually understands it. and no one actually thinks that apples fall from the tree because a curved space tells them to. 'Matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move'.  No one reffers to gravity as the 'space of gravity', instead of the 'force of gravity', which is commonly used in mainstream science. This schizoid and idiotic view is only supported by mainstream science because supposedly there are many experiments which proved einsteins theory, like Pound Rebka, Shapiro and Eddington's, which of course have not because they were all retarded and confused refraction with gravitation effects, and have been absolutelly disproved by me and Doctor Edward Dowdye, a former NASA scientist. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Refraction causes redshift, gravity does not. General relativity is wrong.