A simple demonstration that time dilation is an aberration

 According to the theory of special relativity time flows slower for a moving clock relative to a stationary one. But in the rest frame of the moving clock, the stationary clock is moving. So that means that TIME FLOWS SLOWER for BOTH ???????? Like what the relative fuck ?

If motion is relative, there is no way to tell which clock is stationary and which one is moving, and you can view any of the clocks as being stationary and the other moving relative to it. This leads to a relative contradiction: that no matter if the clock is stationary or moving, it always ticks slower than the other clock. So both clocks are ticking slower than the other. This is contradictory, since obviously if one clock ticks slower, the other one must tick faster. It cant also tick slower. That is logically and physically IMPOSSIBLE.

Therefore special relativity is WRONG.


According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, time dilates for a moving clock relative to a stationary one. But if motion is relative you can view any of the clocks as moving relative to the other. So if you are an observer in the rest frame of the moving clock, the stationary clock is moving relative to you. Therefore, for you the other clock will run slower ! Whereas for an observer in the rest frame of the other clock, your clock will run slower.  But time cannot flow slower in both frames, and if it flows slower in one frame then it must flow faster in the other frame.  So this theory is contradictory and logically inconsistent. Therefore it is wrong. 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more