Plank's constant is quantised BULLSHIT- just like Einstein's photon which is based on it

According to quantum physics, the formula for Energy of an EM wave is E=hf, or E=nhf, where n is number of 'photons', f is the frequency of a photon, and h is Plank's constant. No one knows what h stands for, other than helper- which is what Plank called it. (Plank's energy equation originally was not reffering to photons at all, but after Einstein 'explained' the photoelectric effect using photon particles which waved according to Plank's equation in his Nobel winning 'demonstration', this became the norm in the pseudo-scientific community). 

Does anyone notice anything wrong with that wave equation ? There is no Amplitude in it ! And every wave must have an amplitude. Otherwise it is just a straight line, and has zero energy.


'To summarise, waves carry energy. The amount of energy they carry is related to their frequency and their amplitude. The higher the frequency, the more energy, and the higher the amplitude, the more energy.' *

Therefore, the equation E=nhf for EM energy is wrong since it does not take into consideration the amplitude of the wave (but takes immaginary particles and constants into account), and the correct equation must reffer to the amplitude of the wave obviously, not just its frequency. There is no need to reffer to n number of photons, which dont exist, or to h, which was inserted by Plank as a helper in order to calculate black body radiation, but he had no clue what it actually was related too. But thanks to my brilliance which has disproved Einstein's insane mind bending physics, I have realised what it is related to: it is related to Plank's ignorance regarding basic wave physics, which require that their energy depends on their amplitude (not just their frequency), corroborated with Einstein's ignorance regarding the same basic physics of wave propagation (and refraction)- which has made him dream up illogical photon particles-waves which wave in a vacuum without having any amplitude or medium of propagation ! 

So basically they were both stupid and made up constants from their asses in order to make their theories work or fit the observations. Just because you imagine a number that seems to resolve some equation, which otherwise contradicts basic physics and logic, does not make you a genius. You might well make your theory work mathematically, but you destroy all physics in the process. Like Ptolemy did with his epic epicycles.

*-Reference: https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/2681-waves-and-energy-energy-transfer  


Update: Planks blackbody equation might be right only for blackbody radiation, where ambient light goes in a blackbox through a tiny hole and gets absorbed and reemmited by the blackbody material, and this process happens many times until it gets out. So probably all light that gets out of that stupid blackbox has the same amplitude and thats why that constant h appears.

But it is wrong to attribute it to EM waves in general, because its illogical to assume every EM wave is emmited by a blackbody through a tiny hole, and because it has no amplitude. And energy is proportional with the amplitude squared.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of lig
Read more

Photons are imaginary and irrational particles coming straight from Einstein's crackpipe

In the previous article I have proved why Einstein's gravitational redshift does not exist and his general relativity is wrong (because it's prediction of g-shift was obviously false, and could only be 'proved' by adding a bag of helium which changed the wavelength of light from refraction, and not from gravitation). In this article I will show why his photons don't exist either: because they are inconsistent logically and mathematically ! Einstein invented the photon in order to explain the photo-electric effect, which scientists at his time could not explain using the commonly accepted wave model of light. So the genius Einstein came and enlightened them all. Light is a particle ! But, it is also a wave. Hence, it's a particle-wave. And that is why it causes the photo-electric effect, that is free electrons ejecting from the atoms when ultraviolet light is applied on them. Of course, he got a Nobel prize for this explanation. So it must be true, right ? WRONG
Read more

Dark Energy of Vacuum: from HERO to ZERO

Image
The big bang theory is entirely based on the notion that space expands, because there is a dark energy in empty space or vacuum, which causes space to expand at an accelerated rate. For decades scientists have been looking for this mysterious dark energy of vacuum, and, just like in the case of dark matter, none was able to find it. But why ? The answer is: because the dark energy of vacuum is ZERO, and they are literally looking for nothing in nothing. We know that E=mc^2 (thanks Einstein, I mean Poincare), and we also know that vacuum, being massless, has no mass. Therefore, after crunching the numbers into a quantum supercomputer which doesnt work (thanks Feynman), the dark energy of vacuum is:  E = 0*c^2= 0. Now we can imagine a very dark vacuum in which hides a super dark ZERO, but this super dark zero is no super HERO. Certainly not the dark energetic super hero that pushes all galaxies away at speeds in excess of the speed of light. (no, this is not a script from a bad sci-fi
Read more