Vasile Effect

Given that according to general relativity the planets orbit the sun because they are following the curvature of space-time and its 'geodesics', shouldn't light do the same thing ? Except it doesn't. Because there is no such thing as the curvature of space-time, or space-time for that matter, or geodesics there of. Geodesics by definition can only exist on a surface, while space-time does not have any physical surface on which geodesics can physically exist and influence the trajectory of physical objects. If Einstein's theory of gravity was correct then light would have to orbit the sun like the planets do. Because it would have to follow the same 'geodesics' which makes the earth orbit the sun, or even orbit the earth like the moon does. Light cant just go in a straight line if space is so curved by massive objects that it makes planets go in circles instead of a straight line. Except it does. There is no light bending what so ever at the distance where th

Pseudo scientists affirm that '' General relativity has experienced considerable success because of its way of predicting phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s perihelion and binary pulsars, warping space-time, gravitational red-shifting of light, the relativistic delay of light, the equivalence principle, the geodetic and frame-dragging effects that have been regularly confirmed.'' Except it's succes is based on doctored or illogical experiments which resort to helium to change the wavelength of light, in order to illogically prove a prediction of general relativity which has nothing to do with helium, i.e. a gravitational redshift. Which doesnt exist because it was confused with a refractional redshift which appeared as they added a bag of helium in the g-shift experiment, which otherwise could not produce any 'gravitational redshift' whatsoever. And the observed redshift of the sun and stars is a refractional redshift caused by the refraction of thei

The big bang expansion theory is based on the  assumption that space contains some dark energy which causes space to expand. No such dark energy was ever detected, and this assumption contradicts both special and general relativity. Special relativity because empty space or vacuum has no mass, so it cannot contain any energy because E=mc^2. And General relativity because according to it mass/energy curves space, it does not expand it ! So even if space contained some form of energy, this energy would curve the space and act as gravity, contracting the universe instead of expanding it.  The big bang theory clearly contradicts the very theories on which it claims to be based.

After I showed that quantum physics are wrong, I will show that t he main experiment which led to the development of qunatum physics in the first place, can be easily be explained with classical wave physics, and that it simply does not require the invention of alternate phyiscs based on contradictory particle-wave duality to explain it. The particle does not behave like a wave at all, it simply creates a wave in the aether, and it is this aether wave which inteferres at the slits and creates the interferrence pattern, which affects the trajectory of the particle as it passes through the disturbed medium and is deflected by it. So good old classical wave physics explains the dual slit experiment with ease, and leaves no room for particle wave duality which doesnt rationally explain anything because its a contradiction of terms. The only rational explanation is that aether exists, and the dual slit experiment can be seen as direct evidence of its existence.