Vasile Effect

 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...

MM expected the speed of light to change depending on the motion of the earth in aether. The reason why they did do is because they used Galileean relativity, which adds the velocity of observer to that of the wave. But that is incorrect if we take into account the wave speed equation v=f*lambda and the Doppler effect- which  we know causes a change or shift in observed frequency AND wavelength. But it does NOT cause a shift in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and viceversa. This is why their product v=f*lambda always remains constant. Thats why multiplying observed frequency and wavelength results in an observed velocity which is equal to that of the wave in the medium. And this is exactly why Michelson Morley got their experiment wrong, because they made the wrong assumption that the observed speed of the light wave should change because the observer is moving.   Here is why that never happens: As you see the Doppler equa...

  It is the atmospheric refraction which causes the light to bend. Its very simple: Atmospheric refraction - Wikipedia Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of light or other electromagnetic wave from a straight line as it passes through the atmosphere due to the variation in air density as a function of height . [ 1 ] This refraction is due to the velocity of light through air decreasing (the refractive index increases) with increased density. Atmospheric refraction near the ground produces mirages . Such refraction can also raise or lower , or stretch or shorten, the images of distant objects without involving mirages. Turbulent air can make distant objects appear to twinkle or shimmer . The term also applies to the refraction of sound . Atmospheric refraction is considered in measuring the position of both celestial and terrestrial objects. Diagram showing displacement of the Sun 's image at sunrise and sunset Comparison of inferior and superior mirages due to differing air re...

 Michelson Morley experiment was specifically designed in the context of an aether drag theory. The only reason they expected the speed of light to change in different directions is because they were basing the experiment on Fresnel’s aether drag experiment which they allegedly confirmed, and they believed that this drag would induce an ‘aether wind’ as the earth moves in the aether, which would change the speed of light in different directions. Without this aether drag non-sense, no aether wind should be expected in an universally still aether, and no change in the speed of light should be detected. So the null result simply showed that this aether drag theory is false, and that there is no aether wind, because the aether is UNIVERSALLY STILL, just like Maxwell said it was. ‘Maxwell's equations required that all electromagnetic waves in vacuum propagate at a fixed speed, c . As this can only occur in one reference frame in Newtonian physics (see Galilean relativity ), the aether...

Einstein gravitational time dilation is disproved by the fact that a pendulum or a mechanical watch ticks slower on the moon than on earth, contrary to what einstein predicts that clocks should tick faster in a weaker gravitational field !   If you watch a video of astronauts on the moon, you will see that they are moving in slow motion. Just like a pendulum will be swinging in slow motion. This is basically slowed time. And in the absence of gravity, the pendulum would simply stay still. There would be no force to move it and register time. This is equivalent to a freeze in time. So gravity is the force which generates the flow of time. It is gravity which causes the earth to orbit around the sun and around its axis as well. We would not be talking about days, hours, or seconds, if the earth wasn’t spinning from gravity. Actually we would not be talking at all, because we would be floating in space, where there is no air.

  Photoelectric effect is caused by resonance. Light is a wave, not a particle. Edit Delete post Report this post Quote Post   by  mariuslvasile   As we all know Einstein 'explained' the photoelectric effect by treating light as a particle, and contradicting himself because he agrees light is also a wave. His explanation is not scientific because it is not coherent or self-consistent. My explanation is that it is Resonance which causes this effect. In the same way that a sound wave of a certain frequency can break glass, due to resonance, a light wave of a certain frequency can break an electron from its orbit. So in order to confirm this theory I asked chatgpt what is the orbiting frequency of a ground state electron in an aluminium atom: ChatGPT wrote: The orbital frequency of a ground-state (1s) electron in an aluminium atom, using the Bohr model, is approximately: 5.93×10^15Hz. This frequency is in the ultraviolet (UV) region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Surp...