Vasile Effect

 It is claimed by many scientists that GPS sattelites prove special relativity and general relativity correct because unless it was corrected for SR and GR time dilation it wont have the accuracy that it has.  But special relativity is a special case of general relativity, and only applies to non accelerating objects in the absence of gravitational fields. Special relativity describes how the universe works for objects that are not accelerating, called inertial reference frames. However,  it doesn't incorporate gravity . https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsrelativity In the General Theory, Einstein concerned himself non-inertial frames, in other words motion which involves acceleration. One example is uniform circular motion, where the tangential speed v of an object (in a circle of radius R) is constant but its direction of this velocity is continually changing. https://web.pdx.edu/~egertonr/ph311-12/relativ.htm  You simply cannot apply special relativity in ...

'' Once more, when you are looking at stars near the sun, you notice that the light is only bent when the starlight is inside the corona of the sun, but did not bend outside the corona where Einstein predicted. Einstein’s general theory of relativity predicts starlight should bend at least slightly near the sun outside the corona but this is not observed.'' Edward Dowdye Dr. Dowdye points out that stars outside the corona of the sun in fact do not bend according to Einstein’s general relativity. The reason why light bends in the sun's corona is obviously from refraction, similar to atmospheric refraction: wikipedia said: Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of  light  or other  electromagnetic wave  from a straight line as it passes through the  atmosphere  due to the variation in  air density  as a function of  height . [1]  This refraction is due to the velocity of light through  air  decreasing (the  refractive index...

Add bookmark #1 ESAHubble said: Gravitational lensing occurs when a massive celestial body — such as a galaxy cluster — causes a sufficient curvature of spacetime for the path of light around it to be visibly bent, as if by a lens. The body causing the light to curve is accordingly called a gravitational lens. According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, time and space are fused together in a quantity known as spacetime. Within this theory, massive objects cause spacetime to curve, and gravity is simply the curvature of spacetime. As light travels through spacetime, the theory predicts that the path taken by the light will also be curved by an object’s mass. Gravitational lensing is a dramatic and observable example of Einstein’s theory in action. Extremely massive celestial bodies such as galaxy clusters cause spacetime to be significantly curved. In other words, they act as gravitational lenses. When light from a more distant light source passes by a gravitational lens, the ...

If gravity is nothing but a curvature of space-time, as Einsteins theory of gravity claims, objects should not fall towards earth in a straight line. Instead, they would have to follow that curvature, and the geodesics thereof, and move accordingly on a curved path. But if you drop an object from space, it will simply fall in a straight line towards earth, completely ignoring this magical curvature of space, which Einstein also claims that will bend light.   This curved trajectory can be easily visualised on these illustrations which are used in science books/websites to illustrate how the curvature of space creates gravity in general relativity.

It is often affirmed by mainstream scientists that general relativity is a highly succesful theory because it has been proven by numerous experiments, such as Eddington’s, Shapiro’s, or Pound and Rebka’s. These are the three main tests of general relativity, and none of them has actually proved general relativity. In fact, all of them disprove general relativity if they are correctly analysed and interpreted. 1. Eddington's solar eclipse experiment. In this experiment Eddington attempted to prove that star light is bent by the sun's mass as it curves the spacetime around it, a prediction of general relativity. But light bending around the sun is expected due to refraction from the sun's corona, and simply does not prove it is caused by a curvature of space time. In fact, there is no light bending outside of the sun's corona, which proves that Einstein's theory is wrong. And this has also been proved by a former NASA scientist, Dr Edward Dowdie, who sho...

  Tesla said that 'Light is a sound wave in the aether'. This was also implied by Maxwell who calculated the speed of light as a sound wave in aether, using Newtons equation for sound waves. Just like sound waves loose amplitude in the medium, so do light waves. Classical wave physics perfectly explain the redshift, there is no need for insane space bending metaphyisics. Which reject the existence of a medium for light waves, on the grounds that Einstein made an illogical claim, based on his absurd explanation of the photoellectric effect, that they are also particles, or photons. Which have no amplitude what so ever, because their energy is expressed as a function of frequency only ! E=hf. Einstein, while copying Planks black body radiation, forgot that waves must have an amplitude, otherwise they are lines. Which makes his particle-wave a particle-line. Since you cant have a wave with no amplitude. And the energy of a wave is directly proportional to its amplitude squared, so...

Add bookmark ​ History​ The cosmological constant was originally introduced in Einstein's 1917 paper entitled “ The cosmological considerations in the General Theory of Reality ”. [2]   Einstein  included the cosmological constant as a term in his  field equations  for  general relativity  because he was dissatisfied that otherwise his equations did not allow for a  static universe : gravity would cause a universe that was initially non-expanding to contract. To counteract this possibility, Einstein added the cosmological constant. [3]  However, Einstein was not happy about adding this cosmological term. He later stated that "Since I introduced this term, I had always a bad conscience. ... I am unable to believe that such an ugly thing is actually realized in nature". [12]  Einstein's static universe is unstable against matter density perturbations. [13]  Furthermore, without the cosmological constant Einstein could have found the expans...

  The standard cosmoillogical model or Big Bang theory is entirely based on the notions of vacuum energy and space expansion- which are interlinked (the latter is caused by the first). But at the same time is claimed to be based on general relativity, and also on special relativity. In reality, it flagrantly violates both. In special relativity, energy is equivalent with mass. If energy is equivalent with mass, how does a vacuum or empty space have any energy ? ​ It can't ! Because E=mc^2, and vacuum has no mass, so it can't have any energy either ! The energy of vacuum is precisely ZERO according to SR ! In this theory, empty space or vacuum cannot contain any energy, since it contains no mass which can be equivalated with energy E=mc^2. How can anyone claim that vacuum has energy, without rejecting this equation and special relativity altogether ? And even if vacuum had mass or energy, how does that energy expand space ? In General Relativity space is curved by mass and energ...

Long story short: The Pound Rebka gravitational redshift  experiment has been completely disproved by the Vasile effect, the effect of wavelength increasing or decreasing from refraction, as it relied on a helium bag in order to produce the shift in wavelength of the gammaray, which caused it to refract into air -where the detector and metal target were placed, thus causing a change in its speed and wavelength.  This effect has been mathematically proved and immediatelly results from the equations f=v/lambda and v=c/n, where n is the index of refraction of the medium. Because the frequency f remains constant during refraction, an increase in the speed v of the gammaray will automatically cause its wavelength lambda to increase, which is a refractional redshift.  Given that this phenomenon was not known at the time, it was completelly ignored by the Harvard scientists Pound and Rebka, who did not take into consideration the effects of refraction on the gammaray, and confus...