Posts

Showing posts from October, 2024

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...

Photons do not exist. Waves are not particles.

In special relativity, Einstein equates a light wave with a particle, which he calls a photon, and calculates the momentum of a photon p by equivalating the energy of the wave with the energy of the photon particle. The formula p=h/lambda comes by equivalating the wave energy E=hc/lambda with the particle energy E=pc. But, since p=mc, we get E=pc=mc^2 which is the energy formula for objects with rest mass. Therefore, the two energy equations cannot be equivalated, because the first is for waves, which do not have the property of mass, and the second is for particles with rest mass ! So the problem is that the wave-particle duality equates the energy of a wave, which is indeed massless, with that of a single particle, which is not a massless wave, and derrives all kind of illogical equations from this particle-wave non-sense. Which is an illogical equivocation, a clear logical fallacy made by Einstein, who conflates particles with waves, a foolish mistake which can only lead to wrong de...

NASA is astronomically stupid

  In the article ‘Gammaray bursts: blackhole birth announcements’, NASA says: 'In some cases, matter swirling into the black hole produces two powerful jets that rush outward at almost the speed of light that cause a gamma-ray burst. A Gamma-Ray Burst a Day Sends Waves of Light Our Way!' https://science.nasa.gov/universe/gamma-ray-bursts-black-hole-birth-announcements/ What happened to 'nothing can escape a blackhole, not even light' ? NASA’s level of stupidity is truly astronomical.

Dilatarea temporala gravitationala e o ineptie care nu poate exista nici macar in teorie

In teoria relativitatii generale Einstein sustine ca lumina ar fi incetinita atunci cand intra intr-un 'put gravitational' (gravitational well), pentru ca timpul s-ar dilata pe masura ce lumina inainteaza in preputul gravitational. Asta inseamna ca, in conformitate cu teoria sa, orice obiect care intra intr-un put gravitational ar trebui sa isi micsoreze viteza pe masura ce inainteaza (sau cade) in acesta. Adica ar trebui sa DECELEREZE, nu sa accelereze. Asta inseamna ca acceleratia gravitationala nu ar trebui sa existe, pentru ca teoria gravitationala a marelui Einstein, care a ramas repetent in liceu de genial ce era, implica o deceleratie gravitationala cauzata de incetinirea timpului in preputul gravitational. Si, atentie, in teoria sa gravitatia nu reprezinta o forta, ci tocmai aceasta dilatare a timpului, cuplata cu o curbare a spatiului, care ultima nu se aplica decat la viteze apropiate de cea a luminii. Deci pentru viteze mici spatiul nu se curbeaza, doar cand o bagi i...

Teoria relativitatii generale e absolut tampita. Prostia umana e infinita.

  Un roman cu nume omonim a demonstrat stiintific ca testele clasice care ar fi confirmat teoria relativitatii generale a lui Einstein au fost absolut eronat interpretate de catre fizicieni relativi , care in mod normal ar fi trebuit sa ramana corijenti la fizica. Motivul erorii este ca acestia nu au luat in considerare, sau au ignorat complet refractia undelor electromagnetice in mediile prezente in acele experimente, cum ar heliul si aerul in cazul experimentului gravitational condus de Pound-Rebka, respectiv heliul si hidrogenul in cazul lui Shapiro (Eddington le-a luat considerare, dar le-a minimalizat ca sa-i dea dreptate lui Einstein). Din acest motiv ei au folosit un calcul absolut gresit in care lumina circula cu viteza c indiferent de mediu, in loc de v=c/n, si  au confundat toate efectele reale ale refractiei, precum  indoirea si incetinirea luminii/undelor radio, sau schimbarea lungimii de unda, cu unele imaginare ale gravitatiei, care sunt prezise de teoria lu...

Proving Einstein wrong with highschool physics. General relativity debunked with refraction.

  ‘‘ The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer.[...] 'Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .’ - Wikipedia And, just like Einstein, he completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, which requ...