Vasile Effect

Einstein never used the term 'photon' to describe light as a particle, despite being aware of it he avoided it like the plague. I was a bit harsh on him in my older posts because I was mislead by mainstream physicists in believing that the photon was Einstein's invention, when in fact he had nothing to do with it and rejected it. Like he rejected the existence of black holes, but if you watch these  pseudo-science popularisers like Tyson or Cox or Hossenfender they all claim that BHs are a robust prediction of Einstein's general relativity. Except Einstein rejected the notion of black hole singularities entirely and attempted to prove they are impossible to exist with GR, and they completelly ignore that part because some blackchild 'proved' that they exist using Einstein's theory and field equations, who just like Freidman the weatherman and the big bang priest understood and solved much better than Einstein, in the exact opposite way. So basically Einstein...

  The ONLY reason why classical physicists were expecting to see a variance in the speed of light for moving observers was because they were illogically applying Galileean relativity to waves, and added the speed of the observer to the speed of the wave, thus getting c+v or c-v as the speed of the wave in the observer's frame. If they didn’t all do that foolish thing, they would have NOT expected the speed of light to vary for moving observers ! Which means that, if they correctly understood and applied classical physics, they should have expected it to NOT vary, aka INVARIANCE instead of VARIANCE ! The latter is clearly wrong from a classical physics framework because the speed of the wave only depends on the properties of the medium, and because the wave has a PREFFERED FRAME which is the rest frame of the MEDIUM. Therefore it is illogical to use the rest frame of the Observer as the preffered frame of the wave, and then use Galileean additions to calculate the speed of the wave....