Posts

How can you have a PHD in physics and be this stupid ?

 Answer to Special Relativity: Since clocks traveling at high speeds run more slowly, do clocks at the equator run more slowly than those near the north pole? Has this been measured? by Mark Eichenlaub  https://www.quora.com/Special-Relativity-Since-clocks-traveling-at-high-speeds-run-more-slowly-do-clocks-at-the-equator-run-more-slowly-than-those-near-the-north-pole-Has-this-been-measured/answer/Mark-Eichenlaub?ch=15&oid=3438269&share=c36c5f24&srid=Kxsx&target_type=answer Clocks at sea level run that same speed no matter their latitude, as a simple thought experiment can show. Imagine Alice is at the north pole and Bob is at the equator. Alice has a laser that shoots light to Bob. So mister PHD in physics answers the question by a 'simple thought experiment' which involves shooting a laser pointer from the North Pole to the equator. Simple, right ?  Sure, if we imagine that the earth is FLAT ! Because in the real world if you try to do that with a laser p...

Are Atomic clocks slowed down by Earth's magnetic field ?

  Are Atomic clocks slowed by Earth’s magnetic field ? You bet your compass ! One of the main arguments made by Einstein fanboys in defense of general relativity is that, besides the many experiments which have confirmed it, which I have debunked together with Dr Edward Dowdye from NASA, general relativity is also confirmed by the fact that clocks tick slower in a strong gravitational field than in weaker one, which is a prediction of GR named gravitational time dillation. And give as an example atomic clocks in GPS sattelites which tick faster than those on earth, because the gravitational field is weaker in space. But you know what else is weaker in space ? The Earth’s magnetic field. I know, it’s incredible, but Earth actually has one. Because the Earth is a giant magnet. And the atomic clock has cesium metal atoms in  it, and also a magnet inside...

Casimir effect explained

by Vasile effect   In this experiment two metal plates conductors are placed very close to each other in vacuum, until they attract. Quantum fart theory explains this by quantum flatulations which appear in a quantum vacuum and push the plates with their fart pressure. This is the ultimate proof that vascuum energy exists, they claim ! But wait, didnt they also claim that vacuum energy is expanding space and makes galaxies move apart ? Nevermind, this are just details, who cares if it does the exact opposite here ! But why do the plates have to be metal conductors ? If quantum fart theory was correct, then the plates would be pushed by quantum flatulations even if they were made from plastic. My explanation is that the earth’s magnetic field is causing this effect, by inducing a small current in the plates when they are moved. Thus they are magnetised and the inner parts of the plates have opposite charges, making them attract. Occam’s razor approves this, and e...

'Gravitational time dillation' is caused by the earth magnetic field. General relativity is wrong (again)

Since I have disproved general relativity, and gravitational time dillation with it, people unable to comprehend or admit the simple fact that Einstein was wrong ask me 'but how do you explain that clocks on earth tick slower than clocks in space ? Only general relativity can explain that ! '. Except it doesn't. Because just like space, time isn't a physical object and can't dillate, bend, expand, contract, etc. Just like there isnt anything in a space that can curve or expand, there is nothing in a time that can dillate.  The slowing of the atomic clocks is simply caused by the earth's magnetic field which affects the clock. You see, in space the magnetic field is less strong than on earth, as the strength of the magnetic field decreases with distance- just like gravity. And the atomic clocks are based on cesium atoms which are metal and are affected by the magnetic field. In fact, the atomic clock itself contains a magnet which separates low energy cesium atom...

If time flows slower in a gravitational field, why are all objects falling at a faster rate ? Gravitational time dillation debunked.

  According to general relativity, time flows slower inside a gravitational field, and flows faster as we move outside it. A clock on the surface of the earth will tick slower than a clock situated on a sky plane, or in a space sattelite. So it will show less time has passed than the clock up high in the sky, or in space, because the needle of the clock on earth will move slower from one second to another than the one in the sky, making every second longer, or dillated.  But why don't objects fall slower into a gravitational field then ? Speed is distance over time, so if time passes slower and slower as we move inside a gravitational field, then it would obviously take more and more time to travel the same distance.   Which is the exact opposite of what is actually happening. The falling speed increases as we fall in the gravitational field, because the gravitational pull and acceleration increases with the invert square law (the pulling force gets stronger into, an...

Is gravity a force or a space? If it's not a force, then why is it measured in Newton? If it's a curved spacetime, then why isn't it measured in Einstein, or in curved metersecond?

‘According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, time and space are fused together in a quantity known as spacetime. Within this theory, massive objects cause spacetime to curve, and gravity is simply the curvature of spacetime.’ (esahubble.org) If space and time are fused together, like Einstein claims, then the only way to measure his spacetime is in metersecond, and curved spacetime in curved metersecond. It makes no sense to use time and distance as separate units. Just like it makes no sense to measure the curvature of spacetime which he calls gravity in Newtons. Because that is not a force, and therefore we can’t use the measuring unit of force to measure a non-force. But these relative physicists don’t really care about getting the units right, and go as far as to claim that Einstein’s cosmoiilogical constant Lambda, which has unit of 1/m^2, represents the energy density of vacuum ! When the unit should be Joule/m^3. And then they wonder why they get the worst prediction i...

  Why is the Quantum Field Theory still accepted by scientists after it produced 'the worst prediction in the history of physics' aka the Vacuum Catastrophe? It is clearly a FALSIFIED theory, and anyone who still uses it is catastrophically stupid

Image
  Why is the Quantum Field Theory still accepted by scientists after it produced 'the worst prediction in the history of physics' aka the Vacuum Catastrophe? It is clearly a FALSIFIED theory, and anyone who still uses it is catastrophically stupid! Marius L. Vasile Besides this obvious answer, which no one can deny, it is because they need this Quantum Fart Theory to produce their vaccum fart energy which makes space expand at an accelerated rate in their big bang cosmoillogical model. Which completelly contradicts special relativity and the mass-energy equivalence which states that energy is equivalent to MASS, not with NO MASS, or a vacuum. The equation E=mc^2 clearly shows that a vacuum has no intrinsic energy because it has no mass. And even if vacuum or empty space had mass or energy (by reduction to absurdum), in general relativity mass and energy CURVES space, it does not expand it. So this absurd vacuum energy would just create more gravity aka curved space and make the...