Space-time geodesics are absurdly wrong

 Einstein's theory of gravity is based on the notion that space-time can curve and uses geodesics to describe its curvature. 


But space is not a physical object which can expand or bend. It is the lack there of.  Attributing geodesics to space(time) makes no sense because a geodesic is, by definition, the shortest line between two points on a spherical or curved surface (Oxford def.).


Space has no surface, and time does not have one either, so space-time geodesics are a complete non-sense.


The notion of Geodesic comes from Geodesy, the science which studies earth's shape, which has a curved surface (Geo meaning Earth in latin). It has nothing to do with space, which has no shape or surface. General relativity is based on a complete misuse and misunderstanding of the notion of geodesics. It is completelly illogical as it ignores the definition which requires a surface, which space obviously does not and cannot have.

Unless it is a physical object, like the solid sky firmanent from the babble. Which is not what Einstein believed in, as he called it a book of childish superstitions.

Amen to that !

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refractional redshift completely disproves General Relativity & Big Bang theory

Image
  An introduction to Refractional redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift Marius L. Vasile - absolute skeptic    ' Astronomers know of three sources of redshift/blueshift: Doppler shifts; gravitational redshifts (due to light exiting a gravitational field); and cosmological expansion (where space itself stretches)' -Wikipedia ' Astronomers don't know anything '- Vasilepedia In this paper I will prove that refraction  causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of lig
Read more

Photons are imaginary and irrational particles coming straight from Einstein's crackpipe

In the previous article I have proved why Einstein's gravitational redshift does not exist and his general relativity is wrong (because it's prediction of g-shift was obviously false, and could only be 'proved' by adding a bag of helium which changed the wavelength of light from refraction, and not from gravitation). In this article I will show why his photons don't exist either: because they are inconsistent logically and mathematically ! Einstein invented the photon in order to explain the photo-electric effect, which scientists at his time could not explain using the commonly accepted wave model of light. So the genius Einstein came and enlightened them all. Light is a particle ! But, it is also a wave. Hence, it's a particle-wave. And that is why it causes the photo-electric effect, that is free electrons ejecting from the atoms when ultraviolet light is applied on them. Of course, he got a Nobel prize for this explanation. So it must be true, right ? WRONG
Read more

Dark Energy of Vacuum: from HERO to ZERO

Image
The big bang theory is entirely based on the notion that space expands, because there is a dark energy in empty space or vacuum, which causes space to expand at an accelerated rate. For decades scientists have been looking for this mysterious dark energy of vacuum, and, just like in the case of dark matter, none was able to find it. But why ? The answer is: because the dark energy of vacuum is ZERO, and they are literally looking for nothing in nothing. We know that E=mc^2 (thanks Einstein, I mean Poincare), and we also know that vacuum, being massless, has no mass. Therefore, after crunching the numbers into a quantum supercomputer which doesnt work (thanks Feynman), the dark energy of vacuum is:  E = 0*c^2= 0. Now we can imagine a very dark vacuum in which hides a super dark ZERO, but this super dark zero is no super HERO. Certainly not the dark energetic super hero that pushes all galaxies away at speeds in excess of the speed of light. (no, this is not a script from a bad sci-fi
Read more