Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected.


Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) admit that my assertion was correct:











As you can see the velocity additions CANCEL OUT when we multiply observed frequency and observed wavelength, resulting in speed v - which is the speed of wave in the medium, calculated from the observer's frame. So the observed wave speed always matches the speed of the wave in the medium and does NOT change relative to observer, which means it is INVARIANT. So there is no need for Lorentz tranformations such as relativistic time dilation and length contraction in order to explain the invariance of the speed of light. As it is now obvious that it occurs as a direct consequence of classical wave physics and the Doppler effect, and that Einstein was simply wrong when he discarded the aether based on the null result (invariance) of the Michelson Morley experiment. He was dead wrong all along.

In the specific case of the MM experiment, the observer is comoving with the source, which would make Doppler shift zero because there is no relative motion between source and observer.

So the observed frequency and observed wavelength will be the same as the source frequency and wavelength. Therefore the observed speed of the wave will also be the same, v'=f' lambda'=f lambda=c, and not v+c and v-c as Michelson Morley expected and calculated by adding speed of the earth/observer to the speed of the light wave.


CONCLUSION:

In conclusion the null result of the MM experiment is entirely consistent with the lumineferous aether and classical wave physics, which was misunderstood and misinterpreted by all these physicists to predict variance instead of invariance, a fundamental error which lead them to a fundamentally wrong conclusion: that classical physics must be wrong, the aether does not exist, and to develop magical voodoo metaphysics to take its place in order to explain this ‘unexpected’ and ‘shocking’ invariance. Einstein’s special relativity is simply not needed to explain the invariance of the speed of light, which occurs as a direct consequence of classical wave physics and the Doppler effect. Therefore it is not the aether or classical physics which need to be discarded, but special relativity, which is an obsolete and unnecessary pseudo-science.






Abstract: We show that the speed of light is invariant in classical physics by using Doppler effect, and therefore that the Lorentz transformations which SR relies on are not needed to explain the invariance. The demonstration is quite simple, and is based on the Doppler effect which changes frequency and wavelength for a moving observer/source. Since the speed of the wave is c=flambda, to calculate the speed of light in the observer’s frame we only have to multiply the observed frequency and wavelength for a moving observer relative to a stationary source, and the result is that we get f’lambda’=c, the constant speed of light measured in the frame of the observer. In the case of MM experiment this is even simpler, because the source and observer are moving at the same speed, so there is no doppler shift and the observed speed of light is simply flambda=c.

This completelly discards the need for Lorentz’s transformations and therefore makes Einstein’s SR obsolete.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Shapiro time delay is caused by refraction. Gravitational time dilation does not exist.

' The  Shapiro time delay  effect, or  gravitational time delay  effect, is one of the four classic Solar System  tests of general relativity .  Radar  signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present.  The time delay is caused by  time dilation , which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer. [...] ' Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses  c  as the speed of light  and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a  Schwarzschild solution  to the  Einstein field equations .'-  Wikipedia And, just like Pound and Rebka, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, ...
Read more