Why all classical physicists expected light speed to vary...and why they were wrong.

 The ONLY reason why classical physicists were expecting to see a variance in the speed of light for moving observers was because they were illogically applying Galileean relativity to waves, and added the speed of the observer to the speed of the wave, thus getting c+v or c-v as the speed of the wave in the observer's frame. If they didn’t all do that foolish thing, they would have NOT expected the speed of light to vary for moving observers ! Which means that, if they correctly understood and applied classical physics, they should have expected it to NOT vary, aka INVARIANCE instead of VARIANCE !


The latter is clearly wrong from a classical physics framework because the speed of the wave only depends on the properties of the medium, and because the wave has a PREFFERED FRAME which is the rest frame of the MEDIUM. Therefore it is illogical to use the rest frame of the Observer as the preffered frame of the wave, and then use Galileean additions to calculate the speed of the wave. Doing that only returns the CLOSING SPEED between observer and wave crests, which is NOT the speed of the wave. The logical and correct way to calculate the speed of the wave in the frame of the observer is by using the WAVE EQUATION, v=flambda, and using the (Doppler shifted) observed frequency and wavelength, as shown below:





Galileean relativity treats all frames as equal, so any rest frame can be used as a preffered frame. But they’re obviously NOT equal in the case of waves, since their preffered frame is always the rest frame of their medium, and that cannot be changed with the rest frame of a moving observer. It is illogical and wrong to do that, and ALL physicists did that fundamental error ! That’s why they were expecting the speed of light to vary for moving observers. Because they were foolishly and illogically applying Galileean relativity to waves.

Galileean relativity only applies to particles/objects, and not to waves. Because particles/objects inherit the speed of the frame they are in, for example if you throw a ball in moving train the ball’s speed adds to that of the train. Waves dont do that. If you move a speaker in air the speed of the sound emmited by the speaker does not add to the speed of the speaker, because the speed of the wave only depends on the properties of its medium. So galilean relativity/velocity addition clearly does NOT apply to any waves, including sound and light waves.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fundamental error of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Special relativity is wrong.

Image
''The  Michelson–Morley experiment  was an attempt to measure the motion of the  Earth  relative to the  luminiferous aether , [ A 1 ]  a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of  light waves . The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by American physicists  Albert A. Michelson  and  Edward W. Morley  at what is now  Case Western Reserve University  in  Cleveland , Ohio, and published in November of the same year. [ 1 ] Michelson and Morley's  interferometric  setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of  mercury The experiment compared the  speed of light  in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter, including their laboratory, through the luminiferous aether, or "aether wind" as it was sometimes called. The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference...
Read more

An introduction to Refractional Redshift, and how it was confused with gravitational redshift (updated)

Image
  AN INTRODUCTION TO REFRACTIONAL REDSHIFT, AND HOW IT WAS CONFUSED WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT. GENERAL RELATIVITY DEBUNKED. Marius L. Vasile @Vasile Effect   In this paper I will prove that refraction causes a redshift, which I cleverly named Refractional redshift, and that this redshift was not so cleverly confused with gravitational redshift by the world's finest scientists- we're talking Harvard, Nobel prize level here- which were either ignorant of refraction, or doctors in doctoring experiments with it. Refractional redshift is by far the most common and yet unknown type of redshift- certainly for astronomers, who have no ideea that it exists. It is caused due to the fact that during refraction the speed of light changes, but the frequency remains constant. Since f=v/lambda, where lambda is the wavelength, it immediately follows that the wavelength changes too in order to preserve the frequency. This results in an increase of wavelength or a redshift when...
Read more

Why the speed of light is Invariant in Classical Physics. Einstein was dead wrong

Image
 The speed of light in a vacuum is invariant, meaning it is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source. This is a fundamental postulate of Einstein's theory of special relativity, and it has absolutelly nothing to do with it. It has to do with the Doppler effect and how it changes the frequency and wavelength of the light wave due to the motion of the observer/source. But it does NOT cause a change in the observed velocity. Because if frequency increases, then wavelength decreases, and if frequency decreases, then wavelength increases. The result of this is that their product v=f*lambda will always be constant  when measured by a moving observer. This explains why speed of light is invariable in different inertial frames in classical physics, and why it is not variable as these geniuses like Michelson, Lorentz or Einstein expected. Here is the AI calculation which proves it, which made Google Gemini (following Copilot) adm...
Read more